The first step of a management programme is
to assess the current situation by determining the management
goal, the extent and quality of the area being managed, the
invasive target species affecting the area, and the native
species threatened. The management goal should be the
conservation or restoration of intact ecosystems that support
the delivery of ecosystem services. Eradication and control
options need to be evaluated on the basis of the likelihood of
success, cost effectiveness and any potential detrimental
impacts.
Invasive species need to be arranged in a
priority list that takes into consideration the extent of the
area infested by the species, its impact, the ecological value
of habitats invaded, and the difficulty of control. Species
with the highest priority would be those known or suspected to
be invasive but still in small numbers, species which can
alter ecosystem processes, species that occur in areas of high
conservation value, and those that are likely to be controlled
successfully.
1. Initial Assessment
The first step is to determine the
management goal for any invasives management project. Second,
the target area needs to be defined. It may be an entire
country, all or part of an island, or all or part of a reserve
or conservation area. In some instances regional projects will
include more than one country and need good co-ordination
between countries. Thus, it is often advisable to base an
eradication or control programme of alien species on an
ecosystem, which may cross-political boundaries. However,
sometimes the political situation might prohibit this
approach.
2. Priorities for Management
Priority setting is considered principally
from the viewpoint of ecosystem and species values. However,
managers should recognize that political and public support
and the availability of external support may drive a pest
specific project that might not be a priority from this more
rigorous viewpoint. Priorities are set in the hope of
minimizing the total, long-term workload, and hence cost of an
operation, in terms of money, resources and opportunities.
Therefore, we should act to prevent new infestations and
assign highest priority to existing infestations that are the
fastest growing, most disruptive, and affect the most highly
valued area(s) of the site. We also consider the difficulty of
achieving satisfactory control, giving higher priority to
infestations we think we are most likely to control with
available technology and resources.
The priority-setting process can be
difficult, partly because you need to consider so many
factors. It has been found that it helps to group these
factors into four categories, which you can think of as
filters designed to screen out the worst pests:
-
current and potential extent of the
species on or near the site;
-
current and potential impacts of the
species;
-
value of the habitats/areas that the
species infests or may infest; and
-
difficulty of control.